In defence of this fine cigar, I have to both agree and disagree with my esteemed co-reviewers here.
I’m currently sitting in my easy chair puffing on one of these bought for me by my son-in-law (a fellow of fine and impeccable taste!) for my birthday.
I’m paring it with a tumbler of Johnnie Walker Green (in my option the best of the Johnnie Walker’s) with just a splash of water to open up the flavours.
The draw is good and even, although the finest draws of any cigar I’ve ever smoked has to go to the excellent Punch Punch.
This particular Montecristo Dantes is well made, with a hint of spiciness at the beginning, and has a rich chestnut-brown wrapper. It is burning evenly and as a consequence is a very rewarding experience. The ash is well compacted with a dark slate grey hue which is interwoven with lighter shades of grey.
I have in the past suffered a badly made Cuban cigar and it was an awful experience. It is the downside of Cuban quality control that sadly quite a few inferior cigars get through to the customer. My advice is that if you want consistently well made cigars you probably need to opt for a Davidoff or one of the Alec Bradleys, but of course nothing matches the flavour of a fine Cuban cigar.
Half way through my Monte and the spice has fallen away and the flavours have intensified and I’m tasting bourbon biscuits, wood-smoke and leather.
The taste (apart from the falling away of the spice) has been consistently good and is a credit to the Torcedor who made it. I’m guessing it was rolled by one who cares for his/her craft.
This Cuban is proving to be a good smoke and so to close my review I would like to cheekily quote Kipling re Cuban cigars:
“And a woman is only a woman, but a good Cigar is a Smoke.
Light me another Cuba—I hold to my first-sworn vows.
If Maggie will have no rival, Ill have no Maggie for Spouse!”